Post engager lead list

This is a working screen for a Deel AE who has just seen a post worth mining. It takes one LinkedIn post URL, pulls everyone who commented, and splits them in two. The worklist is the people who fit: each row is the person, the comment they actually left, and a drafted opening line that answers that comment, side by side at desktop width and stacked on a phone. Opening a row gives the full picture — what Trayo found they care about, their recent roles, their company, their verified work email, and the score broken into its four parts. The second screen is everyone who was dropped, with the reason for each, because a rep needs to trust the filter before they trust the list. The third shows the source post, all eleven people on it, and the ICP the scoring ran against.

The post is Alex Bouaziz’s “Introducing Akai” from 21 September 2026 — Deel’s own CEO, so this is the “mine” case of the three the brief allowed. I picked it after searching Trayo for posts on global payroll, EOR and cross-border hiring and finding that almost every on-topic post in the last 30 days had zero stored comments; this one had the most engagement of anything Trayo held. Trayo supplied all of it: trayo_search_posts found the post, trayo_get_post_engagers returned the author plus 10 commenters with their comments and photos, trayo_research_person_batch came back with roles, insights and challenges for all 10 with no errors, trayo_research_company resolved 6 employers (headcount, industry, one-liner), and trayo_enrich_emails found 4 verified work emails out of 5 attempted. The 5 who passed were written into the Trayo workspace with trayo_add_people. Scores, drop reasons and opening lines are this tool’s judgement layered on that data, not something Trayo returned.

Three honest caveats. The engager set skews to AI-automation practitioners rather than Deel’s people-ops ICP, because the post was about agents, not payroll — so only 5 of 10 passed, and three of those five sit at companies of 1-10 people, just under the 10-employee floor in Deel’s saved ICP; they are kept as founder-buyers and visibly scored down for it. Deel’s competitor rule matched nobody on this post, so the screen reports a clean check rather than demonstrating a drop. Two of the four emails came back verified but on a different domain than the company on record (both people run several ventures), and the UI flags that rather than hiding it. Push to Salesforce, Send opener and Share to Slack are stubs: they raise the kit’s preview toast and nothing leaves the browser. On brand, the kit’s brandFromWorkspace read #C5B1F9 as the primary and #1B1B1A as the ink, text-on-primary and top bar; applyBrand reported that it assumed a white page, tinted the canvas to #faf9ff, and derived #6a5697 for accent text, links and focus rings because the lavender is under 4.5:1 on a light page. Both supplied colours are in use; nothing was left out.